SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATNARAIN AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDER SINGH AND ANR – Respondent


Civil Revision No.799 of 2010 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Civil Revision No.799 of 2010 (O&M)

Date of decision: 01.12.2010

Satnarain and another

....Petitioners

Versus

Mahender Singh and others

....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH

Present: - Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

*****

ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL)

Petitioner has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this

Court assailing the order dated 12.6.2007 passed by Additional Civil

Judge (Senior Division), Rewari, as well as judgment dated 9.12.2009

passed by Additional District Judge, Rewari, thereby rejecting the

application, for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated

29.9.200,1 under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

Suit for specific performance of contract was decreed ex parte

on 29.9.2001. Sube Singh defendant No.2 is alleged to have received

summons on his behalf as well as on behalf of his brother Ramotar. It is

alleged that Ramotar was not having cordial relat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top