IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Revision No.7282 of 2012 (O&M)

Date of decision: 26.12.2012

Major Singh

...Petitioner

versus

Jagjit Singh and another

....Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

----

Present:

Ms. Veerpal Kaur, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

----

1.

Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ? No.

2.

To be referred to the reporters or not ? No.

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No.

----

K.Kannan, J.

1.

The revision is against the order passed by the trial

Court finding that the court fee paid was insufficient and directing

the petitioner to pay ad valorem court fee on the value of the land for

the property covered under the sale deed which was challenged as

having been brought about by practicing fraud on the plaintiff. The

plaintiff himself was a party to the document dated 15.09.2011 and

the court below was upholding the objection taken by the defendant

that since the plaintiff himself was a party to the document, he was

required to set it aside and pay ad valorem court fee. In so doing, the

Civil Revision No.7282 of 2012 (O&M)

- 2 -

trial Court was rel