SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
R V MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
SUBRAMANIAN AND ANR – Respondent


Civil Revision No. 7257 of 2017 (O&M)

-1-

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

Civil Revision No. 7257 of 2017 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 16.11.2017

R.V.Mehta

......Petitioner

Versus

Subramanian and another

......Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Parshotam Lal Singla, Advocate

for the petitioner.

****

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J

This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India assailing the order dated 3.10.2017 (Annexure P-7)

vide which the applications filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC to

file the rejoinder and lead additional evidence at the rebuttal stage, had been

dismissed.

The petitioner was asked to place on record the statement made

by the plaintiff as well as the zimni orders. Those documents have been

placed on record and are taken on record.

The plaintiff filed a suit seeking possession of a portion

measuring 6.78 marlas out of the total land measuring 3 kanals 404 square

yards of plot No. 4 fully detailed in the plaint. The case of the plaintiff was

that he was the owner of plot No. 4 and the defendants were in illegal an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top