SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
JOGINDER SINGH ETC – Appellant
Versus
DALIP SINGH ETC – Respondent


!!"#$#%&''(')

Joginder Singh and others

...Appellants

Versus

Dalip Singh and others

...Respondents

&*+

Present:

Mr. Mohinder Singh Joshi and

Mr. A.S. Gill, Advocates

for the appellants.

Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. Sudhir Paruthi, Advocate

for respondent No.6.

Mr. J.R. Mittal, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. Kashmir Singh and

Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocates

for respondents No.25, 27 to 29 and 31.

,- ./

1.

Suit was filed by appellant No.1, Sohna Mal, predecessor

of appellants No.2 to 6, appellants No.7 to 10 and proforma

respondents No.34 and 35 against rest of the respondents and their

predecessors for declaration that they are owners in possession of

the land measuring 117 kanals 8 marlas as fully detailed in head note

of plaint with consequential relief of permanent injunction.

SURESH KUMAR

2014.11.14 17:26

I attest

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top