SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PREM CHAND – Appellant
Versus
RANDHIR SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CR No.973 of 2017

Date of decision: 09.02.2017

Prem Chand

..Petitioner

Versus

Randhir Singh

..Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate

for the petitioner.

***

Daya Chaudhary, J.

Petitioner-Prem Chand filed a suit for permanent injunction

restraining the defendant from interfering, encroaching upon, dispossessing,

laying rasta, constructing Gali over the land in dispute before the trial Court.

Suit was decreed in favour of the petitioner vide judgment and decree dated

16.02.2015. Thereafter, an application was moved by the petitioner-decree

holder under Order 21 Rule 32 read with Section 151 CPC for taking strict

legal action against judgment debtor/respondent for causing willful

disobedience of decree dated 16.02.2015 passed against him by attaching

the property of the judgment debtor. Said application is still pending. After

judgment and decree passed in the civil suit, execution petition was filed by

the plaintiff-petitioner and during pendency of the execution, an application

was moved for appointment of Local Commissioner. However, the

application moved

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top