SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
O&M) BANK OF BARODA – Appellant
Versus
A.K.SHARMA ETC – Respondent


RSA No.2789

1

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

RSA No.2789 of 1987

Date of Decision:

Bank of Baroda

...Appellant

Versus

Shri A.K. Sharma and others

.....Respondents

1. Whether Reporter of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment- Yes.

2.To be referred to the Reporters or not- Yes.

3. Whether judgment should be reported in the digest-Yes.

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh

Present:

Mr.Ashok Gupta, Advocate

for the appellant.

None for the respondent.

.....

Alok Singh, J.

1.

Present second appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-Bank

under Section 100 CPC challenging the judgment and decree dated

4.4.1987 passed by First Appellate Court/District Judge, Gurdaspur

thereby allowing first appeal and dismissing the suit of the plaintiff-

Bank on the ground, suit is barred by limitation.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the suit was brought by

Bank of Baroda against A.K. Sharma, Ex. Accountant of the Bank and

Mrs. Anita Rani wife of A.K. Sharma, alleging inter alia that A.K.

Sharma-defendant worked as Accountant in the Bank. During this

period he committed breach of trust by misappropriating the amounts

entrusted to him a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top