SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(O&M) PARVEEN SHARMA & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PRITAM SINGH & ORS ( DECIDED V/O DTD.23.01.2014 BY HMJ-424 ) – Respondent


FAO No.1310 of 1993 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

FAO No.1310 of 1993 (O&M)

Date of Decision: January 23, 2015

Parveen Sharma and another

...Appellant(s)

Versus

Pritam Singh and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? No

Present: Mr. Amandeep Saini, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. Abhishek Goyal, Advocate for

Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate

for respondent No.3.

*****

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J.

1.

This appeal is by the claimants seeking enhancement in the

compensation allowed to them vide award dated 16.12.1992, passed by

the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ludhiana (here-in-after

referred to as the Tribunal).

2.

Briefly narrating the facts. An accident took place on

10.11.1991 which led to filing of two claim petitions seeking

compensation for the death of Pawan Kumar and for injuries to

Rajinder Paul. This appeal has been filed by the legal heirs of

Pawa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top