SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
O&M) NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
CHAND CHHABRA AND ORS – Respondent


FAO No.889 of 1994

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

FAO No.889 of 1994

Date of Decision. 03.08.2010

National Insurance Company Limited, SCO No.332-334, Sector 34-A,

Chandigarh through its Regional Manager

......Appellant

Versus

Smt. Chand Chhabra and others

......Respondents

Present: Mr. L.M. Suri, Senior Advocate with

Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate

for the appellant.

None for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate

for respondent No.6.

Mr. Ashok Jindal, Advocate

for respondent No.6-A.

None for respondent No.7.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ? Yes

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ? Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes

-.-

K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)

1.

The insurance company challenges the liability on the

ground that the vehicle had been actually transferred and the same

had not been brought to the notice of the insurer. The contract of

insurance will come to an end and the liability could not be fastened

on the insurer. It was the further contention of the insurance

company that one of the witnesses on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top