HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RATTAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PB – Respondent
CRR 585/2003
CRR No. 585 of 2003 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
--
CRR No. 585 of 2003
Date of decision: 19.04.2010
Rattan Lal
........ Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.......Respondent(s)
Coram:
Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present:
Mr. B S Walia, Advocate
for the petitioner
Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab
for the respondent- State
-.-
1.
Whether Reporters of local papers may be
allowed to see the judgement?
2.
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3.
Whether the judgement should be reported in
the Digest?
Nirmaljit Kaur, J.
This is a revision petition against the judgement dated
30.01.2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ropar upholding the
conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioner under Sections 279, 337
read Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code vide judgement/order dated
15.05.2002 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Anandpur Sahib.
As per the facts as recorded by the Additional Sessions Judge
that the case advanced by the prosecution are that on 11.0.199, one Lekh
Ram son of Shanker Singh Rajpoot resident of Village Balorh, Police
CRR No. 585 of 2003 2
Station Boranj, District Hamirpur made a statement to the police that he is
working as Teacher and on 11.08.1998 at about 10.30 am, he along with his
daughter Veena Kumari were going to Chandigarh for her interview and
they were travelling in Bus No. HP 20 0669. The Bus was being driven by
Sohan Singh and it belonged to Una Bus Depot. He stated that he and his
daughter Veena Kumari were sitting on his right hand and various other
passengers were also travelling in the same bus. When the bus reached
near Kalyanpur Pacca main road, leading from Ropar to Nangal, it was
12.45 pm. At that time, one truck bearing No. HIB 2713 came from the
Kiratpur Sahib side which was being driven by a driver who had tied a
parna on his head. The said truck was being driven in a very rash and
negligent speed and it hit against the side back portion of the bus, as a result
of which, the arm of Veena Kumari was cut and the same fell down on the
road side. She suffered various injuries on her person and died on the spot
in the bus itself. At a small distance, the truck driver stopped the truck and
then he ran away from the spot leaving the truck there. Veena Kumari was
taken to Civil Hospital, Anandpur Sahib, where the post mortem of the dead
body was done. The complainant stated that the accident has taken place
due to rash and negligent act of the truck driver. After recording his
statement, the FIR was registered. The investigations were conducted,
during which the accused was arrested, the truck and the bus were taken in
custody, there mechanical tests were also got done, site plan was prepared,
inquest report was also drawn, photographs of the site were taken, the post
mortem report was obtained from Civil Hospital, Anandpur Sahib and after
completion of the investigations, the challan was presented in the court for
CRR No. 585 of 2003 3
the trial of the accused.
The trial was conducted. Evidence was led by the prosecution.
The statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was also recorded.
In his defence, the accused has examined Ramesh Kumar, Clerk in
Himachal Pradesh Ex Service Men Corporation, Camp Office District
Bilaspur as DW1 and also proved the documents Ex.D1 and Ex D1/A to
show that the truck in question was hired by the Union and Vijay Kumar
was the driver of the truck at that time and not the present petitioner. It was
stated by the petitioner/accused that he was only owner of the truck. The
trial Court disbelieved the evidence led by the petitioner/accused and held
him
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.