SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MOHIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP 5093/2022



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CWP-5093-2022 (O&M)

Date of decision:- 14.03.2022

Mohit

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE

HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Mr. Dalip Kumar Tuteja, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

* * * *

RAVI SHANKER JHA, C.J. (ORAL)

The petitioner has filed this writ petition being aggrieved by the

fact that the respondent-authorities are treating him as a general category

candidate while considering his claim for admission in the MBBS course for

the session 2021-2022, whereas he has in fact applied as a BCA candidate.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent-

authorities have wrongly rejected his claim as the BCA candidate by stating

that at the time of filling up his admission form (Annexure P-1), he had

mentioned that he is a creamy layer candidate, whereas there is no such

requirement therein. Nor is there any requirement in the said form to specify as

to whether an applicant is a creamy layer or a non-creamy layer candidate. He

further submits that the petitioner has raised a grievance in this regard before

the respondent-authorities, but the issue has not been examined.

Mr. Deepak Balyan, learned Additional Advocate General,

Haryana submits that as the process of counselling is going on, the Director,

Medical Education and Research (DMER), Haryana or the competent authority,

whether it be the Counselling Committee or some other authority designated by

the State of Haryana, would immediately look into the matter and take a

decision in respect of the petitioner9s grievance by today or tomorrow.

In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for

the petitioner as well as the statement of learned State counsel, the writ petition

stands disposed of.

(RAVI SHANKER JHA)

CHIEF JUSTICE

(ARUN PALLI)

JUDGE

14.03.2022

Amodh

Whether speaking/reasoned

Yes/No

Whether reportable

Yes/No

AMODH SHARMA

2022.03.15 14:28

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top