HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
KIRPAL SINGH RANDHAWA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent
CRM 41911/2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.41911-M of 2006
Date of Decision: January 10, 2007
Kirpal Singh Randhawa
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab & others
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr.Gurmeet Singh, Advocate,
for Mr.R.S.Bains, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr.M.C.Berry, Sr.DAG, Punjab,
for the State.
*****
Kirpal Singh Randhawa, an important witness in the case of
abduction and disappearance of Jaswant Singh Khalra, Human Rights Activist,
seeks directions for his proper security, which, according to him, is being
thinned despite the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Jaswant Singh
Khalra, was allegedly murdered brutally by group of nine police officials,
including the then SSP, Tarn Taran, leading to registration of an FIR No.14(S)/
95/Delhi under Sections 120-B, 364, 302, 201 read with Section 34 IPC. This
FIR had been registered under the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and
Criminal Misc.No.41911-M of 2006 :2:
was investigated by the CBI, which had presented this challan.
The petitioner, who admittedly is an eye-witness in the
murder case of Jaswant Singh Khalra, fears that his security is
endangered in view of the withdrawal of Escort Gypsy earlier
provided to him under the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court,
which has resulted in his security guard being ineffective in travelling
with him, while he is required to go on some social or other such
commitments. The perusal of the petition would reveal that the
petitioner has given an eye-witness account in the case of above-
noted murder trial leading to conviction of different police officials for
an offence under Sections 302/201.364/120-B/34 IPC. Having regard
to the involvement of police officials and the importance of this case,
the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 15.3.1996 had given
directions for providing full protection to all the witnesses, who were
assisting the CBI in investigating this murder case known as `Khalra
murder case'. The order in this regard has been annexed as
Annexure P-1 with this petition and the relevant portion thereof reads
as under:-
“We direct the Home Secretary and the Director General
of Police, State of Punjab, to give full protection to all the
witnesses who are assisting the CBI in this investigation
as and when any of the witnesses ask for police
protection (independent) the same be provided to them.”
It may also need a notice that having regard to sensitive nature of the
case and the influence that the police officials may have been able
to exercise, the directions were issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
to transfer all the police officials out of district Amritsar. So much so
Criminal Misc.No.41911-M of 2006 :3:
that Shri Ajit Singh Sandhu, SSP, Tarn Taran was not permitted to
retain accommodation at Taran Taran, though he had been
transferred from the district under the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court. On request made by DSP K.S.Joshi, Investigating Officer,
CBI, Jaspal Singh, DSP, Tarn Taran and Surinder Pal Singh, SHO,
Police Station, Sarhali were directed to be transferred from the
District with the further directions that they shall not be posted either
in the Districts of Amritsar or Tarn Taran or the adjoining Districts.
Complying with the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the
petitioner was provided six gunmen, three from CISF and three from
Punjab Police, who have remained with him for providing protection
to his life and liberty. He was also provided Escort Gypsy alongwith
150 litres of petrol per month for his day-to-day pursuits. It is in this
background that the prese