SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
LALIT KUMAR ETC – Appellant
Versus
GENERAL PUBLIC ETC – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CASE NO.: F.A.O. 5280 of 2002

DATE OF DECISION : July 23rd,2009

Lalit Kumar Sharma and others

.......Appellants

versus

General Public and others

......Respondent

CORAM :

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

PRESENT: Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, Advocate

with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. Ashwani Chopra, Sr. Advocate

with Ms. Shilpa Malhotra, Advocate

for respondents No.3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and

Legal Representatives of respondent No.1.

Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate

for Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate

for respondents No.11 to 17.

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.

Late Piare Lal executed a Will in favour of Hari Narain,

bequeathing his property in favour of his son Hari Narain. Admittedly, the

present application for grant of probate was filed by late Hari Narain. Late

Hari Narain and the present appellants, who are the legal heirs of late Hari

Narain, moved an application for grant of probate of Will dated 25-07-1962.

The District Judge, Ambala granted probate in favour of late Hari Narain

vide order dated 04-11-1969. However, one Subhash son of Santosh filed

an application for revival of probate proceedings and permission to con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top