CWP No.9104 of 2002

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CWP No.9104 of 2002

Date of Decision.18.12.2014

Sh. Ram Dev Goel

.......Petitioner

Versus

Haryana Tourism Corporation through its Managing Director and others

......Respondents

2.

CWP Nos.9105 to 9110, 9137, 9140, 9141, 9181, 9184 and

9185 of 2002

Present:

Mr. S.S. Behl, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Mr. Roopak Bansal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. C.S. Singh, Advocate for

Mr. G.S. Hooda, Advocate

for the respondents.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

-.-

K. KANNAN J.

1.

This batch of writ petitions challenge the correctness of the

orders passed by authorities constituted under the Public Premises Act.

The eviction was sought on the ground that the respective acts of

possession of the petitioners have become unauthorized on the non-

compliance of the demand contained in their notices issued to them

requiring them to vacate the premises on expiry of the licence granted

to them to o