SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUKHBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
CRM 56687/2006



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.56687-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION:13.11.2006

Sukhbir Singh

..........Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

..........Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL

Present:-

Shri G.S. Hooda, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Shri M.S. Sindhu, DAG, Haryana.

****

Petitioner Sukhbir Singh apprehending his arrest in a non-

bailable offence in case FIR No. 144 dated 28.3.2006 under Sections

420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar,

has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.

I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the

contents of the FIR.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner sold his

share along with one Ram Ratti, who is alleged to have been impersonated

by Saraswati. Counsel further contends that Saraswati has already been

granted regular bail and her husband Mahender Singh, at whose instance,

she allegedly impersonated as Ram Ratti, has also been granted

anticipatory bail by this Court. Counsel contends that as far as petitioner is

concerned, he sold his share and he is not party to the conspiracy of

impersonation by Saraswati.

Counsel for the petitioner further contends that in view of the

order dated 21.9.2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact

has not been disputed by the State Counsel.

Crl. Misc. No.56687-M of 2006

-2-

In view of the above, the interim bail, granted vide order dated

21.9.2006 is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation

culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for

material change in the circumstances. Thereafter the petitioner shall be

entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall

further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by

the court of competent jurisdiction.

Disposed of accordingly.

November 13, 2006

(SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

pooja

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top