RSA No. 1047 of 2003

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

RSA No. 1047 of 2003

Date of Decision: 23.7.2009

Surat Singh and others

......Appellants

Versus

Harnam Singh

.....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Shri P.K. Gupta, Advocate and Shri Munish Gupta, Advocate,

for the appellants.

Shri R.D. Yadav, Advocate, for the respondents.

HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral).

The plaintiffs are in second appeal aggrieved against the

judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby suit for

permanent injunction, challenging the consent decree dated 27.5.1992,

suffered by defendant No.1 in favour of defendant Nos. 2 to 6 was

dismissed.

The plaintiffs are sons of brother of Deena, whereas the

defendants are sons of another brother of Deena, namely, Mehar Chand.

Deena died issueless. He suffered a consent decree, on the basis of alleged

family settlement, in favour of sons of Mehar Chand on 27.5.1992, which

decree was challenge