SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUNDRI DEVI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH AND ORS – Respondent


PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

CHANDIGARH

114

CR-1294-2022 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 11.04.2022

SUNDRI DEVI AND ORS

... Petitioners

Versus

SANTOSH AND ORS

... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

***

Present:

Mr. Manish Bhasin, Advocate and

Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate

for the petitioners.

****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227

of the Constitution of India raising a challenge to the order dated

27.01.2022 passed by the Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra vide which

the appeal filed by the respondents against the order passed on an

application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the C.P.C.

for grant of ad-interim injunction has been allowed and the order dated

22.10.2021 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kurukshetra has

been set aside.

As per the facts involved in the instant case, Dharam Pal, the

predecessor-in-interest of respondents-plaintiffs was recorded as owner in

possession of the land measuring 08 kanal 06 marla out of total land

comprising in khewat no.154, 155, 156 and 157 situated at village Doda

Kheri, Tehsil Thanesar, Distr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top