IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

204

CRWP-3087-2022

Decided on : 22.11.2022

Shalu and another

. . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

. . . Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana.

****

SANJAY VASHISTH

, J. (Oral)

At the outset, learned State counsel has filed the status report

dated 23.07.2022, by way of an affidavit of Kulwant Singh, HPS, DSP (HQ)

Kaithal, on behalf of State of Haryana, which is taken on record, subject to

all just exceptions. Office to tag the same at appropriate place.

Although there is no assistance from the side of the petitioners,

yet learned State counsel submits that as per the status report, submitted by

him before this Court, present petition can be disposed of. Relevant

paragraphs of the said status report says as under:-

“3.

That during inquiry both the petitioners stated that from her

childhood petitioner no. 1 was living with her Nana-Nani in village

Chochra Distt. Karnal. My Nana engaged petitioner no. 1 with

petitioner no. 2 but her Maternal Uncle namely Naresh respondent

no. 4, his sons Rohit-respondent no. 5 and Mohit-respondent no. 6

was not happy with this relationsip. Due to this relation petitioner

no. 1 and petitioner no. 2 wants get marriage with each other. But the

petitioner no. 1 was minor at that time. On 29.03.2022 they left their

homes without informing anyone and a case was got registered! by

her Grand Maternal-fAther in Police Station Ashandh. Due to fer

they filed! the present petition in Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Now petitioner no. 1 is major. The date of birth of petitioner no. 1 is

17.06.2004. Both the petitioners have come back to their home. Now

they don't have any danger from respondent no. 4 to 6 because

private respondents are agree with the marriage of petitioner no. 1

JAWALA RAM

2022.11.22 18:14

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

CRWP-3087-2022

- 2 -

and 2. The statement of Petitioner no. 1 and Petitioner ro. 2 are

annexed as Annexure-R-1 and Annexure-R-2 for kind perusal of this

Hon'ble Court.

4.

That during inquiry Ishwer s/o Kripa r/o Vill. Chochda distt.

Karnal Maternal Grand Father of petitioner no. 1 also stated that

neither he nor any member of his family has grudge with the

marriage of petitioner no. And petitioner no. 2. Petitioner no. 1 is

now major and both the petitioners have no danger with respondent

no. 4 to 6. The statement of Ishwer s/o Kripa is araxed as Annexure-

R-3 for kind perusal of this Hon bie Court.

5.

That during inquiry both the petitioners stated that now they

have no danger from respondent no. 4 to 6 and they do not want any

action against them and writ petition for safety may be dismissed.

6.

That during inquiry it was found that the petitioners did not

give any representation to respondent no. 2 on 01-04-2022. However,

life and liberty of the petitioners shall be protected in accordance

with law. The inquiry report verified by Incharge Police Station Civil

Line Kaithal is annexed as Annexure-R-4 for kind perusal of this

Honble Court.

7.

That during inquiry respondent no. 4 to 6 also gave statements

that both the petitioners don't have any danger from them. The

Statement of respondent no. 4 to 6 are Annexed as Annexure-R-5 to

Annexure-R-7.”

In view of the reply filed by State of Haryana in Court today, it

appears that nothing more is left for this Court to examine the issue of threat

perception to the petitioners.

Keeping in view of the fact that there is no issue left for

examination, present petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(SANJAY VASHISTH)

JUDGE

November 22, 2022

J.Ram

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No

Whether Reportable:

Yes/No

JAWALA RAM

2022.11.22 18:14

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document