SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
RAJBIR AND ANR – Respondent


RFA No.309 of 2021(O&M)

and other connected cases

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

RFA No.309 of 2021(O&M)

and other connected cases

Date of decision:19.04.2022

State of Haryana and another

...Appellants

Versus

Rajbir and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:

Mr. Baldev Raj Mahajan, Advocate General, Haryana

with Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana,

Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana, and,

Mr. Harsh Vardhan, AAG, Haryana.

Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate.

Mr. Jaivir Yadav, Sr. Advocate

with Mr. Nitish Sharma, Advocate

Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate

with Mr. Saurabh Garg, Advocate

Mr. Ram Darshan Yadav, Advocate

Mr. Surjit Singh Chaudhary, Advocate

Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate

Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocate

Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate

Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate

Mr. Gulshan Nandwani, Advocate

Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate

for Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate

Mr. A.K. Yadav, Advocate

Mr. S.S. Khurana, Advocate

for the landowners.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1)

In the present RFA, the following questions need deliberation:-

(1)

With respect to acquisition of immovable property during

transitional period b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top