HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
RAJBIR AND ANR – Respondent
RFA No.309 of 2021(O&M)
and other connected cases
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.309 of 2021(O&M)
and other connected cases
Date of decision:19.04.2022
State of Haryana and another
...Appellants
Versus
Rajbir and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present:
Mr. Baldev Raj Mahajan, Advocate General, Haryana
with Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana,
Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana, and,
Mr. Harsh Vardhan, AAG, Haryana.
Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate.
Mr. Jaivir Yadav, Sr. Advocate
with Mr. Nitish Sharma, Advocate
Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate
with Mr. Saurabh Garg, Advocate
Mr. Ram Darshan Yadav, Advocate
Mr. Surjit Singh Chaudhary, Advocate
Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate
Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocate
Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate
Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate
Mr. Gulshan Nandwani, Advocate
Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate
for Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate
Mr. A.K. Yadav, Advocate
Mr. S.S. Khurana, Advocate
for the landowners.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
1)
In the present RFA, the following questions need deliberation:-
(1)
With respect to acquisition of immovable property during
transitional period b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.