SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATBIR – Appellant
Versus
MANGE RAM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

(1)

R.S.A. No.2958 of 2000

....

Satbir.

....... Appellant through Shri

Vipin K.Bali, Advocate.

Versus

Mange Ram and others

....... Respondent nos. 1 to 5

through Shri C.B. Goel,

Advocate.

Respondent nos. 6 to 7 ex

parte.

(2)

R.S.A. No.2020 of 2005

....

Satbir.

....... Appellant through Shri

Pritam Saini, Advocate.

Versus

Mange Ram and others

....... Respondents

through Shri C.B. Goel,

Advocate.

Date of Decision: 29.4.2009

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER

....

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to

see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

....

R.S.A.No.2958 of 2000

-2-

....

Mahesh Grover,J.

This order will dispose of the above mentioned two Regular

Second Appeals as they relate to one suit property and are inter se between

the same parties.

Since the facts involved in both these appeals are inter-

connected, they are being noticed in continuity rather then being reco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top