HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATBIR – Appellant
Versus
MANGE RAM – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
(1)
R.S.A. No.2958 of 2000
....
Satbir.
....... Appellant through Shri
Vipin K.Bali, Advocate.
Versus
Mange Ram and others
....... Respondent nos. 1 to 5
through Shri C.B. Goel,
Advocate.
Respondent nos. 6 to 7 ex
parte.
(2)
R.S.A. No.2020 of 2005
....
Satbir.
....... Appellant through Shri
Pritam Saini, Advocate.
Versus
Mange Ram and others
....... Respondents
through Shri C.B. Goel,
Advocate.
Date of Decision: 29.4.2009
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
....
1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to
see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
....
R.S.A.No.2958 of 2000
-2-
....
Mahesh Grover,J.
This order will dispose of the above mentioned two Regular
Second Appeals as they relate to one suit property and are inter se between
the same parties.
Since the facts involved in both these appeals are inter-
connected, they are being noticed in continuity rather then being reco
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.