SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUKHDARSHAN SINGH ETC – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PB.ETC – Respondent


Advocates:
['HS SAGGU', 'SK LADDI', 'AS JATTANA', 'AG PB']

Crl. Revision No. 262 of 2002

{1}

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

Crl. Revision No. 262 of 2002

Date of Decision:December 10, 2009

Sukhdarshan Singh and another

---Petitioners

versus

State of Punjab

---Respondent

Coram:

HONBLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH

***

Present:

Mr. S.K.Bawa, Advocate,

for the petitioners

Mr.Abhishek Chautala, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab

Mr. A.K.Saini, Advocate,

for Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Advocate,

for the complainant.

***

GURDEV SINGH, J.

Petitioners-accused Sukhdarshan Singh and Jaswinder Singh

@ Raju along with Bimla Devi, were tried by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class,

Barnala, and were convicted for the offences under Sections 323 and 324 of

the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of one year and for a period of two years

respectively. They filed an appeal against that conviction and sentence but

was dismissed qua the petitioners but was allowed qua Bimla Devi, who

Crl. Revision No. 262 of 2002

{2}

was ordered to be released on probation by learned Additional Sessions

Judge, Barnala. Thereafter, the petitioners have preferred the present

revision petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top