SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
DAYA NAND & ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HRY – Respondent


L.P.A. No. 3055 of 2001

1

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.

L.P.A. No. 3055 of 2001

Date of Decision: 14.02.2008.

Daya Nand and Others

…Appellants through

Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate

Versus

State of Haryana and Another.

…Respondents through

Mr. B.S. Rana, Additional

Advocate General Haryana.

(for respondent No.1)

Mr. Ravinder Hooda,

(Advocate for respondent No.2.)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER JAIN,

CHIEF JUSTICE

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH

AHLUWALIA

1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspaper may be allowed to

see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Vijender Jain, Chief Justice.

For establishment of new grain market, construction of Staff

Quarters, Rest House, Gadda Sheds and office building at Meham.

Government of Haryana issued a notification under Section 4 of the

L.P.A. No. 3055 of 2001

2

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “the Act”) on 8.10.1985 followed by

another notification under Section 6 of the Act on 12.6.1986. These

notifications were issued for acquiring 37 acres 6 kanals and 8 marlas of

land in Meham, District Rohtak. Howe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top