HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
TALWINDERBIR SINGH AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL CANAL OFFICER AND ORS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.131
Civil Writ Petition No.9092 of 2022
Date of Decision : May 09, 2022
Talwinderbir Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
Divisional Canal Officer, Abohar Canal Division, Abohar, District Fazilka
and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL
Present:
Mr. Baltej Singh Sidhu, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Satveer Singh Badal, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
*****
SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
On an application filed by the private respondents for change in
turn of water, the relief was granted by the Deputy Collector. Against this
order, statutory appeal has been filed in which ex parte stay was granted
vide order dated 21.04.2022. The same has been vacated vide order dated
22.04.2022 only on the ground that the office brought to the notice of the
concerned officer that a caveat had been filed in the case. It is submitted
that the ex parte interim stay was granted till the first hearing of the case and
thus, vacation of the same without notice to the petitioners was illegal.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Arun K. Kaundal, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of
re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.