Crl. Revn. No.2176 of 2007

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Case No. : Crl. Revn. No.2176 of 2007

Date of Decision : November 19, 2007.

Gurpreet Singh and others

....

Petitioners

Vs.

Balwinder Singh and another

....

Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL

* * *

Present :

Mr.S.S.Majithia, Advocate

for the petitioners.

* * *

L.N.MITTAL, J. (Oral) :

Charge under Section 326 IPC was not framed by the

Magistrate against the petitioners but in revision petition, the Revisional

Court, vide impugned order dated 01.10.2007, ordered framing of charge

under Section 326 IPC against Gurnam Singh – petitioner no.2 and charge

under Section 326 read with Section 149 IPC against the remaining

petitioners. Feeling aggrieved, the instant revision petition has been filed

by the accused persons.

Admittedly, on X-Ray examination, fracture was found. The

injury had been caused with sharp weapon. So, the offence falls under

Section 326 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the

injured got himself admitted in the hospital after eight hours. This is hardly

a ground for quashing of charge under Section