SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PREM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


CRR No. 1933 of 2008 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRR No. 1933 of 2008 (O&M)

Date of decision : 17.2.2018

...

Prem Singh

................Petitioner

vs.

State of Haryana and others

.................Respondents

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan

Present: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General,

Haryana.

Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)

Accused - Dhup Singh @ Pappa, Bhim Singh and Raj Singh

@ Raja all sons of Manka residents of Village Pauli, Police Station

Julana, District Jind, were booked in FIR No. 159 dated 4.12.2003

for offences under Sections 323, 325, 506, 307, 34 IPC, registered at

Police Station, Julana, on the allegations that on 20.11.2003, at about

7.30 P.M. while complainant was alone in his fields then Raj Singh @

Raja , Dhup Singh @ Pappa and Bhim Singh, were sitting in the

fields concealing their presence. While complainant was returning

home, all three of them assaulted him. Raj Singh @ Raja armed w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top