SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
YASHPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


CRIMINAL REVISION NO.376 OF 2008 :{ 1 }:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 12, 2008

Yashpal

.....Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Punjab

....Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

PRESENT:

Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Mehardeep Singh, AAG, Punjab,

for the State.

Mr. Sanjiv Pandey, Advocate,

for the complainant.

****

RANJIT SINGH, J.

The petitioner stands convicted for offences under

Sections 498A and 406 IPC by JMIC, Ludhiana. The petitioner was

sentenced to suffer RI for 2 years coupled with fine of Rs.1000/-

under Section 406 IPC and RI for 1 year with fine of Rs.500/- for an

offence under Section 498A IPC.

The petitioner impugned his conviction for the said

offences and sentence awarded to him by filing appeal before First

CRIMINAL REVISION NO.376 OF 2008 :{ 2 }:

Appellat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top