SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
HANS RAJ – Appellant
Versus
BHIM RAM AND ANR – Respondent


Criminal Revision No. 1096 of 2009

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Criminal Revision No. 1096 of 2009

Date of Decision:October 13,2010

Hans Raj

...........Petitioner

Versus

Bhim Ram and another

..........Respondents

Coram:

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina

Present: Mr.Amandeep Singh,Advocate for the petitioner.

**

Sabina, J.

Petitioner-Hans Raj was convicted for an offence under Section

354 of the Indian Penal Code (`IPC' for short) vide judgment dated 3.1.2009

passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Sirsa. Vide

order dated 7.1.2009, petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of three months under Section 354 IPC . Hence,

the present revision petition.

The brief facts of the case, as noticed by the trial Court

in para 2 of its judgment, are as under:-

“2. Briefly stated the case of the prosecution that on 3.8.2007 a

ruqa was received in the police station from the Civil Hospital,

Criminal Revision No. 1096 of 2009

2

Sirsa regarding admission of Pammi Bai. On receipt of the same,

ASI Amar Nath rushed to Civil hospital, Sirsa to record the

state

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top