SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AVTAR SINGH & ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Revision No.2888 of 2009

Date of decision : 6.11.2009

Avtar Singh and others

....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

....Respondents

****

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND

Present: Mr. O.P.Kamboj, Advocate for the applicant.

S. D. ANAND, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the only

apprehension of the petitioners is that the learned Trial Court may not

proceed to hold a trial afresh in the light of the remand order and further

that the disposal of the trial may not get delayed.

The petitioners had been convicted by the learned Trial

Magistrate for the offences under Sections 420 read with Section 120-B

IPC. The learned Additional Sessions Judge ordered a remand of the

case for the proper recording of the statement of the petitioners under

Section 313 Cr.P.C. The learned Additional Sessions Judge had noticed

certain very relevant facts which formed the very foundational premise of

the charge and which had not been put to the petitioners in the course of

their statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. The learned Additional

Sessions Judge did not order th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top