SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAHUL – Appellant
Versus
PIRTHI RAJ AND ORS – Respondent


124

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CR-2304-2022 (O&M)

Date of Decision: July 14, 2022

Rahul

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Pirthi Raj and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

Present:

Mr.Rajinder Kumar, Advocate

for the petitioner.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated

19.05.2022 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Fazilka, whereby, an

order dated 01.02.2022 passed by Learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Abohar,

has been reversed and the injunction application has been allowed.

Material facts, as culled out from the pleadings placed on the

record are that, initially, respondent No.1/plaintiff filed a suit for permanent

injunction against the present petitioner Rahul and performa respondents,

thereby restraining petitioner-defendant No.3 and performa defendants,

from interfering into the peaceful possession over the land measuring 16

Kanals 00 marla, comprised in Rect. No.94 Killa No.9 (8-0), 12 (8-0),

Khewat No.335/10, Khatauni No.651, as per Jamabandi for the year 2017-

18. Further restraint had also been sought from destroying/damaging the

Kinnow orchard and interfering in the culti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top