HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
M/S OSTER KNIT PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP 11599/2019
CWP 11599 of 2019 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP 11599 of 2019
Date of decision:21.08.2019
M/s Oster Knit Pvt.Ltd.
..............Petitioner
v.
Union of India and others
..............Respondents
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh
Hon'ble Mr.Justice Lalit Batra
Present:-
Mr.Jagmohan Bansal,Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Sunish Bindlish,Advocate for the respondents.
Jaswant Singh,J,
Petitioner-a private limited company imported one
consignment of blankets through Ludhiana Port and respondents
detained the said consignment by forming an opinion that the goods
in question were not blanket but fabric. The dispute regarding
classification of said consignment was decided by Customs,Excise
and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal vide order dated 28.8.2018
whereby appeal of the respondents was dismissed and classification
of consignment as claimed by the petitioner was upheld. In the
interregnum petitioner further imported three more consignments
which were released by respondents against bank guarantee
furnished by the petitioner. In the present petition, it is grievance of
the petitioner that the dispute having been finally adjudicated by the
Tribunal, the respondents are not releasing the bank guarantee
RAJINDER PARSHAD JOSHI
2019.08.22 10:19
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP 11599 of 2019 2
furnished by it.
Notice of motion was issued.
On 19.7.2019 counsel for the respondents sought time
with the assurance that before the next date the respondents would
release the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner.
At the time of hearing today, learned counsel for the
respondents has produced letter dated 20.8.2019 written by Assistant
Commissioner(Legal), office of Commissioner of Customs,Ludhiana
whereby it has been stated that the bank guarantees stand released
to the party. The said letter is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner who is present in Court
does not dispute the contents of the said letter and concedes that
the present writ petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(Jaswant Singh)
Judge
21.08.2019.
(Lalit Batra)
joshi
Judge
Whether
Speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No
RAJINDER PARSHAD JOSHI
2019.08.22 10:19
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document