HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAM NARAIN AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
CRR 106/2011
Crl. Revn No. 106 of 2011 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Revn No. 106 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of decision : 16.07.2012
Ram Narain and others
....Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr Jaswant Jain, Advocate
for the petitioners
Mr. Kartar Singh, DAG, Haryana
***
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Challenge is to the order dated 16.11.2010 passed by the
Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hissar whereby the petitioners have been
summoned to face the trial.
The marriage of Sushila was solemnized with Ajay Kumar
on 12.11.2005. Out of this wedlock, one issue was born but he died on
21.04.2007 and now there is no surviving child out of this marriage.
They were living separately since 27.01.2007. Due to tempramental
differences, respondent No. 2 has lodged the F.I.R against him on
account of bringing less dowry and harrassment. After investigation,
Crl. Revn No. 106 of 2011 (O&M)
-2-
the challan was presented against Ajay Kumar-husband of the
respondent No. 2. Subsequently, respondent No. 2 filed an application
dated 16.12.2009 inter alia stating that the case was registered on her
statement against Ajay Kumar and the petitioners for causing
harrassment, humiliation and threat to life on the demand of dowry.
During investigation, police has not arrested the petitioners.
Respondent No. 2 appeared as P.W.1 and again named the petitioners
as accused. From the evidence of P.W.1, the petitioners were also
summoned to face the trial.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has tendered the
certified copy of order dated 08.05.2012 whereby petition filed under
Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act by Ajay Kumar and Sushila was
allowed and the marriage between them was ordered to be dissolved
by decree of divorce by mutual consent. They have also given their
joint statement to the effect that Ajay Kumar has paid a sum of
Rs.2,50,000/- to Sushila on account of permanent alimony and now
nothing is due towards either side. It has further been settled between
the parties that all the pending cases between the parties shall be
withdrawn, in view of this settlement.
After going through the certified copy of order dated
08.05.2012, it transpires that parties have settled their dispute and the
Crl. Revn No. 106 of 2011 (O&M)
-3-
complainant has been compensated fairly.
In view of the above, order dated 16.11.2010 passed by the
Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hissar is set aside along with all
consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
16.07.2012
(RITU BAHRI)
G.Arora
JUDGE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.