HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
JOGINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
/11879/2022
115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP-11879-2022
Date of Decision: 30.05.2022
JOGINDER SINGH AND OTHERS
...Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present :
Mr. Krishan Kumar Thakur, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petitioners herein, inter alia, seek issuance of a writ in the
nature of certiorari/mandamus for directing the respondents to regularize
their services according to policy decision dated 01.10.2003 and 10.02.2004
(Annexures P-1 and P-2) or from the date, when similarly situated
employees/juniors to them have been granted the benefit.
2.
Petitioners were initially appointed as Daily Wage Labourer in
the year-2003 on different dates. However, they were not regularized relying
on Apex Court judgement in State of Karnataka and others vs Uma Devi
and others 2006(4) SCC 1. They assert that on the other hand, vide order
dated 14.10.2006, the services of 199 daily wage labourers, who are juniors
to them were regularized. Qua their grievance, the petitioners moved a
representation, but no action was taken by the respondents till date. The
petitioners thereafter sent a legal notice dated 05.03.2021 (Annexure P-6)
and the same too has not been adverted.
3.
On advance service, learned State counsel appears and submits
that a decision will be taken by the competent authority, either way, on the
GURPREET KAUR
2022.05.31 16:06
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order /
judgment
CWP-11879-2022
-2-
pending legal notice dated 05.03.2021 (Annexure P-6) by passing a speaking
order.
4.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners also seeks
decision on the pending legal notice, as suggested by learned State counsel.
5.
Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to
seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or
pleadings are required.
6.
Without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant writ
petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to look into the
legal notice dated 05.03.2021 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner and pass an
administrative order, in accordance with law.
7.
Let the needful be done as expeditiously as possible.
May 30, 2022
(ARUN MONGA)
gurpreet
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No
GURPREET KAUR
2022.05.31 16:06
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order /
judgment