HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
IDEAL PRIVATE SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR – Respondent
CWP 10743/2009
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10743 OF 2009 :{ 1 }:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 17, 2010
Ideal Private Schools Association (Regd.), Faridabad
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
PRESENT:
Mr. S. P. Jain, Sr.Advocate with
Mr. Dheeraj Jain & Mr.Davesh Moudgil, Advocates,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana,
for the State.
Mr. Vikas Suri, Advocate,
Sr.Standing counsel for respondent No.2.
****
RANJIT SINGH, J.
This order will dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos.10743 of
2009 (Ideal Private Schools Association (regd.), Faridabad Vs.
State of Haryana and another)
, 13939 of 2009 (Digamber Jain
and another Vs. State of Haryana and others), 15077 of 2009
(Haryana Progressive School's Conference (regd.), Faridabad
Vs. State of Haryana and others), 15910 of 2009 (Haryana
Engineering College, Jagadhri, Distt. Yamuna Nagar Vs. State of
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10743 OF 2009 :{ 2 }:
Haryana and others), 18004 of 2009 (Seth Nand Lal Bajaj
Education Charitable Society, Chandigarh Vs. State of Punjab
and another)
, 18965 of 2009 (New Daffodil Public School, Patiala
Vs. State of Punjab and another), 5302 of 2010 (Association of
the PSEB affiliated Schools (Pb.) (Regd.), Ludhiana Vs. State of
Punjab and another), 6135 of 2010 (Sarvhitkari Educational
Society (Regd.), Chandigarh Vs. State of Punjab and another),
8798 of 2010 (M/s Jyoti Model Sr.Sec.School, Kotakpura Vs.
State of Punjab and another) and 12891 of 2010 (Haryana School
Welfare Association (Regd.), Bilaspur, District Yamunanagar
Vs. State of Haryana and another).
A hotly debated issue raised in these ten writ petitions is
“whether Employees' State Insurance Act can be made applicable to
Un-aided Education Institutions”. The lead petition is filed by
Association of Private Schools, namely, Ideal Private School
Education (Regd.), Faridabad. Other writ petition Nos.13939, 15077,
15910, 18965, 18004 of 2009 and 12891, 5302, 6135 and 8798 of
2010, containing identical challenge, have been filed by various
Institutions. The facts are mainly extracted from CWP No.10743 of
2009 and all the petitions are being disposed of through this common
order as common question of law arises in these petitions.
The petitioner-Association in CWP No.10743 of 2009
claims to be an Association representing about 150 recognised
Unaided Private Schools, affiliated to Haryana School Education
Board and are situated in various parts of District Faridabad
(Haryana). All these schools are receiving no grant-in-aid nor any
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10743 OF 2009 :{ 3 }:
other assistance of facility from the Government of Haryana. The
petitioners are aggrieved against the action of the State Government
in issuing notification under Section 1(5) of Employees' State
Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter called as “ESI Act”). The proposal to
extend the provisions of the Act to the educational Institutions upon
its due approval by the Central Government was published on
11.4.2008. Accordingly, a notice was given for taking up the proposal
into consideration after expiry of period of six months from the date of
publication of the notification in the official gazette. Objections or
suggestions, if any, received from any person, likely to be affected
were also to be considered along with the proposal to extend the
provisions of the ESI Act to unaided educational institutions. The
description of the establishment to which the provision