SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SURESH AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


CRR No. 3267 of 2010

-1-

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

CHANDIGARH

CRR No. 3267 of 2010 (O&M)

Date of Decision :1.3.2011

Suresh

.......... petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...... Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present :

Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. P.S. Virk, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

****

RITU BAHRI, J.

This criminal revision has been filed against the impugned

judgment dated 15.11.2010 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions

Judge, Bhiwani whereby the appeal of the petitioner has been

dismissed and upheld the judgment of conviction and sentence order

passed by the learned trial Court vide which the petitioner has been

convicted and awarded sentence for one year and and to pay fine of

Rs. 500/- under Section 354/34 IPC.

The petitioner has challenged the judgment of the learned

Courts below on the ground that the learned Courts below have

totally ignored the statements of PW-1, PW-2 & PW-3. There are

material contradictions in the statement of PW1, who had stated that

CRR No. 3267 of 2010

-2-

police came at 9/10.00 a.m. on 20.7.2004 and further it was stated

that the police came at 2/2.30 p.m. PW-2 stated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top