SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MALAK SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


Crl. Revision No.2663 of 2011 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Crl. Revision No.2663 of 2011 (O&M)

Date of decision: 01.11.2011

Malak Singh @ Malik Singh and another

....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH

Present: - Mr. K.S. Gill, Senior Advocate, with

Mr. R.K. Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioner.

1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

*****

ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL)

Accused/revisionists are assailing judgment dated 17.10.2011

passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Jalandhar,

whereby appeal filed by the accused/revisionists (appellants therein) was

dismissed upholding the judgment of conviction and sentence dated

29.8.2008 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jalandhar.

Brief facts of the present case are that Davinder Singh son of

Malkit Singh Chadha and Mohinder Kaur wife of Pritam Singh filed a

complaint with the police alleging that property No. EF-190 bearing

khasra No.8073/3 measuring 7 marlas 81 sq. ft. situated at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top