IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Crl. Revision No. 51 of 2011 (O&M)

Date of Decision: January 20, 2011

Santokh Singh.

…Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab.

… Respondent

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH

1.

Whether reporters of local news papers may be

Allowed to see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. C.L. Pawar, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab,

for the respondent-State.

Alok Singh, J. (Oral)

This revision petition is filed by the revisionist-

petitioner against the judgment dated 20.12.2010 passed by

learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Kapurthala, whereby while

affirming the conviction of the petitioner for offences under

Sections 419, 465, 471 and 120-B IPC passed by learned

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapurthala, modified the

sentence and in fact, he was sentenced to undergo RI for a

period of two years under Section 419 IPC and fine of

CRR No.51 of 2011

Rs.1000/-, to undergo RI for a period of two years under

Section 465 IPC and fine of Rs.1000/-, to undergo RI for a

period of one year under Section 471 IPC a