HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
NEELAM BALI ETC – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB ETC – Respondent
CWP 3790/2006
C.W.P.No.3790 of 2006 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Date of decision: 06 .03.2009
C.W.P.No.3790 of 2006
Smt Neelam Bali and others
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
Present:
Mr. S.S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for
respondents No.1 to 3.
C.W.P.No.17688 of 2006
Raj Guru and others
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
Present:
Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents.
C.W.P.No.15065 of 2007
Balwant Ram
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
Present:
Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents.
C.W.P.No.1342 of 2008
Avtar Singh and others
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
Present:
Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents.
C.W.P.No.5150 of 2008
Kashmir Singh
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
C.W.P.No.3790 of 2006 2
Present:
Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents.
C.W.P.No.11472 of 2008
Vijay Kumar and others
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
Present:
Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents.
C.W.P.No.11498 of 2008
Tarlochan Singh and others
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
Present:
Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents.
C.W.P.No.11753 of 2008
Harminder Kaur
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
Present:
Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents.
C.W.P.No.11756 of 2008
Mohinder Kaur
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
Present:
Mr. R.S. Rangpuri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents.
C.W.P.No.14619 of 2008
Darshan Singh and others
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
Present:
Mr. Surender Garg, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents.
C.W.P.No.3790 of 2006 3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
JASWANT SINGH,J
This judgment shall dispose of abovesaid ten writ petitions
bearing CWP Nos.3790 of 2006, 17688 of 2006, 15065 of 2007, 1342 of
2008, 5150 of 2008, 11472 of 2008, 11498 of 2008, 11753 of 2008, 11756
of 2008 & 14619 of 2008 since common questions of facts and law are
involved in these writ petitions. For the sake of brevity and with the
consent of counsel for the parties, facts from CWP No.3790 of 2006 have
been taken and dealt with.
The core issue involved in all the above stated writ petitions is
as to whether the petitioners, who were working as JBT/C & V Teachers
(Hindi/Punjabi Teachers etc) in the same pay scale as that of promotional
post of Master/Mistress, would be entitled to grant of one additional
increment on their promotion to the post of Master/Mistress on the ground
of assuming higher responsibilities.
CWP No.3790 of 2006
Petitioners, four in number, have filed the present writ petition
praying for quashing of order/reply to the legal notice dated 2.1.2006
(Annexure P.4) vide which the respondents have rejected the claim of the
petitioners for grant of benefit of one increment on their promotion from the
post of Hindi Teacher to Hind