HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUKHWINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS – Respondent
/4025/2012
CRR-4025-2012(O&M)
# 1#
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
CRR-4025-2012(O&M)
Date of Decision:-19.04.2022
Sukhwinder Singh.
......Petitioner.
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors.
......Respondents.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present:-
Mr. H.S. Dhindsa, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sidakmeet Singh Sandhu, AAG Punjab.
Mr. N.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the Respondent nos.2 to 4.
***
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL)
The present revision has been preferred by the complainant
against the judgment dated 04.01.2011 of the Learned JMIC, Jagraon
whereby the accused-respondents no.2 to 4 (herein) were acquitted in case
FIR No.360 dated 07.11.2005 under Sections 447, 511 and 34 of IPC P.S.
Jagraon and the order in appeal where their acquittal was further upheld by
the court of learned Additional Sessions, Ludhiana vide judgment dated
22.05.2012.
2.
The case as per the prosecution emanates from the statement of
Sukhwinder Singh son of Pritam Singh made before HC Labh Singh on
VINAY MAHAJAN
2022.04.26 17:20
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
CRR-4025-2012(O&M)
# 2#
07.11.2005 to the effect that on 3.11.2005 at about 10 am, his uncle Raghvir
Singh, along with his two sons viz. Jasvir Singh and Kuldip Singh above
named had illegally ploughed the land belonging to complainant and his
brother Avtar Singh, abutting the road, situated at village Roomi with their
red coloured Eicher tractor. The said land was in the ownership of the
complainant and his brother Avtar Singh since the year 1991. Raghvir Singh
and his sons Jasvir Singh and Kuldip Singh due to greediness had taken
illegal and forcible possession of their land. The complainant tried to arrive
at a compromise with Raghvir Singh, but they did not pay any heed to the
requests of the complainant. On the basis of said statement a ruqa was sent
through Jagtar Singh to police station Jagraon for the registration of the case
and the present case was registered. The investigating officer viz. HC Labh
Singh conducted investigation, inspected the spot and prepared the site plan,
recorded the statements of witnesses under Section 161 Cr.PC. The
Investigation Officer also investigated the matter from Halqa Patwari and
arrested accused Raghvir Singh, Jasvir Singh and Kuldip Singh, above
named on 14.11.2005 as per rules, who were later on released on bail. After
completion of the necessary formalities, the instant challan has been
presented in the Court.
3.
On finding a prima facie case against the accused, charge under
Sections 447, 511 read with Section 34 IPC was framed against them to
which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
PROSECUTION EVIDENCE
Oral Evidence
PW-1
:
Sukhwinder Singh, the complainant
PW-2
:
Jugraj Singh
PW-3
:
Balwinder Singh
PW-4
:
HC Karam Singh
VINAY MAHAJAN
2022.04.26 17:20
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
CRR-4025-2012(O&M)
# 3#
PW-5
:
Jaspal Singh, Patwari of V. Dhollan
PW-6
:
ASI Labh Singh, the IO
PW-7
:
HC Hardev Singh, the attesting witness of memos.
PW-8
:
Resham Singh, Reader in the Court of SDM,
Jagraon.
Documentary Evidence
Ex.PA
:
Statement of Complainant
Ex.PC/1
:
Ruqa
Ex.PD
:
Carbon Copy of FIR
Ex.PE
:
Rough Site Plan
Ex.PF
:
Recovery memo of tractor no.PIB 5688 of accused
Ex.PG
:
Memo of grounds of arrest.
Ex.PH
:
Personal Search memo of all the accused.
Ex.PI
:
Recovery memo of copies of RC of tractor and DL
of accused.
Ex.P1
:
Copy of Jamabandi for the year 2002-03
Ex.P2
:
Copy of jamabandi for the year 1987-88
Ex.P3
:
Copy of Khasra Girdawri for 2004-05 of land of
complainant.
Ex.PW-8/A
:
True copy of RC of tractor No.PIB-5688 of
accused Kuldip Singh
Mark-A
:
Copy of Sale Deed dated 11.07.1991.
4.
On closure of the evidence of the prosecution, the statement of
the accused under Section 313 Cr.PC were recorded in which the entire
prosecution evidence and incriminating material was put to the accused to
which they claimed their false