HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATPAL S/O PREM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Crl. R. No.86 of 2012
Date of Decision:12.1.2012
Satpal
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.... Respondent
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present:
Mr. Sanjiv Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to
see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
The petitioner and his father were found innocent. They were
kept in column No.2 while Ashok Kumar was challaned by the police and
he was charge sheeted by the learned trial Court under Section 302 IPC read
with Section 25 of the Arms Act vide order dated 29.8.2006. An application
under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon the petitioner and his father as an
accused moved by the complainant was dismissed by the learned Sessions
Judge vide order dated 19.10.2006. Aggrieved against the said order, State
of Haryana as well as complainant filed a Criminal Revision petition before
the High Court. The High Court allowed Crl. R. No.2538 of 2006 vide
order dated 2.5.2008 and directed to summon the petitioner as an accused.
Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.