SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATPAL S/O PREM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Crl. R. No.86 of 2012

Date of Decision:12.1.2012

Satpal

.... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

.... Respondent

CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur

Present:

Mr. Sanjiv Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to

see the judgment?

2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)

The petitioner and his father were found innocent. They were

kept in column No.2 while Ashok Kumar was challaned by the police and

he was charge sheeted by the learned trial Court under Section 302 IPC read

with Section 25 of the Arms Act vide order dated 29.8.2006. An application

under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon the petitioner and his father as an

accused moved by the complainant was dismissed by the learned Sessions

Judge vide order dated 19.10.2006. Aggrieved against the said order, State

of Haryana as well as complainant filed a Criminal Revision petition before

the High Court. The High Court allowed Crl. R. No.2538 of 2006 vide

order dated 2.5.2008 and directed to summon the petitioner as an accused.

Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top