HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SHAM SUNDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
Crl. Revision No. 2468 of 2013 (O&M)
-1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Revision No. 2468 of 2013 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 7.8.2013.
Sham Sunder
........Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana
......Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present:
Mr. Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Jasmandeep, Advocate
for the petitioner.
.....
SABINA, J.
Petitioner had faced the trial qua commission of
offence punishable under Section 7/16 of Prevention of Food
Adulteration Act, 1954 ('IPC'' for short) in a complaint filed by
the State. The Trial Court vide judgment/order dated
12.8.2011 ordered the conviction and sentence of the
petitioner under Section 7 read with Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the
Act. Aggrieved against the said judgment/order of his
conviction and sentence, petitioner preferred an appeal. The
Appellate Court vide judgment dated 23.7.2013 dismissed the
appeal filed by the petitioner. Hence, the present petition by
the petitioner.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner,
I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves
dismissal.
Prosecution story, in brief, is that compla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.