SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
DARSHNA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.13106 OF 2010 :{ 1 }:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 06, 2010

Darshna Devi

.....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others

....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

PRESENT:

Mr. Anil Malik, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

****

RANJIT SINGH, J.

Husband of the petitioner died on 15.2.2001 while he was

working as Assistant Treasurer at Guhla in Treasury and Accounts

Department, Haryana. In response to an application made, son of

the petitioner was offered a post of Peon on 29.1.2004. He did not

accept the same as he considered himself entitled to for a post of

Clerk, which was one step lower than the post held by his late father.

The petitioner accordingly made a request on 10.9.2004 to the

respondents to appoint her son to the post of Clerk under an ex-

gratia scheme as per the Rules then prevalent. The respondents, in

response, requ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top