SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
GAURAV YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR – Respondent


Criminal Revision No. 725 of 2013

1

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

Criminal Revision No. 725 of 2013

Date of decision: 4.3.2013

Gaurav Yadav

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another

..Respondents

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.S. Bedi

Present:

Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG,Haryana

Mr. Rajesh Bhateja, Advocate

for respondent No.2.

Respondent No.2 in person.

..

M.M.S.Bedi,J(Oral)

The petitioner has been convicted by the courts below

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Complainant-Sanjeev Yadav is present in person, who

states that he has received the amount of the cheque from Gaurav

Yadav and he has compromised the matter. He has got no

objection in case the revision petition is allowed and petitioner is

acquitted as the matter has been compromised.

Statement of complainant Sanjeev Yadav has been

recorded separately. The complainant-Sanjeev Yadav has been

identified by his counsel. The offence stands compounded as per

the statement of the complainant.

Criminal Revision No. 725 of 2013

2

Petition is disposed of as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top