SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AJMER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


Crl. Revn No. 2355 of 2014 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Revn No. 2355 of 2014 (O&M)

Date of Decision:- 28.08.2014

Ajmer Singh

....Petitioner

versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Manoj Kumar Pundir, Advocate

for the petitioner

Mr. Shekhar Mudgal, AAG, Haryana

****

RITU BAHRI , J.

Challenge is to the order dated 04.07.2014 passed by

Addl. Sessions Judge, Rohtak whereby the judgment of conviction

dated 07.12.2012 and order of sentence dated 10.12.2012 passed

by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak, has been upheld.

Petitioner was convicted substantially for a period of six months,

under Sections 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food and

Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short ' the Act').

Brief facts of the case are that on 23.09.2003, at about

8.30 A.M, Om Kumar Government Food Inspector, District Rohtak

inspected the premises of the accused at Gohana Road, near Inder

Cold Store, Rohtak. At the time of inspection, the accused was

having in his possession about 30 litres of cow milk contained in

two iron drums for public sale. He demanded a sample of said milk

by issuing a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top