SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SANDEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 19927 of 2009

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.19927 of 2009

DATE OF DECISION: MAY 16, 2011

Sandeep

.....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others

....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

PRESENT:

Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate with

Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate.

Mr. ID Singla, Advocate.

Mr. Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate.

Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate.

Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate.

for the petitioner(s).

Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana

for the State.

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 19927 of 2009

-2-

Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate.

Mr. Sidharth Batra, Advocate.

Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate.

Mr. Dinesh Nagar, Advocate.

Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate.

****

RANJIT SINGH, J.

This order will dispose of writ petition Nos.19927,

19965 and 20127 of 2009, 1605, 1637, 1646, 1647, 1648, 1649,

1650, 1651, 1652, 2272, 2837, 2838, 2839, 3742, 6940, 7980, 8594,

16675 and 16703 of 2010.

Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter

called HU

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top