SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ZILE SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent
CWP 10236/2013



CWP No.10236 of 2013

1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CWP No.10236 of 2013

Date of decision:13.05.2013

Zile Singh

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?

Present:

Mr.Paramjit Jakhar, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK,

J.

(Oral)

Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of

respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this Court by way of

instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India,

seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the

grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed, he finally approached

Deputy Commissioner, Hisar-respondent No.2, vide representation dated

31.7.2012 (Annexure P-2), but the same is also pending decision. He

further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent

No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the

petitioner, within a reasonable time.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, including the

CWP No.10236 of 2013

2

issue of limitation, if any, Deputy Commissioner, Hisar-respondent No.2,

is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner

and decide his representation dated 31.7.2012 (Annexure P-2), at an

early date, by passing an appropriate order thereon, in accordance with

law, but in any case within a period of three months from the date of

receipt of a certified copy of this order.

With the observations made above, the present writ petition

stands disposed of.

13.05.2013

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK)

mks

JUDGE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top