IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Civl Writ Petition No.16917 of 2011

Date of Decision : September 09, 2011.

Narinder Singh and others

.....Petitioners

versus

The State of Punjab and another

.....Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

Present : Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab.

-.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

---

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

Notice of motion.

Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General,

Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Let two copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned

State counsel during the course of day failing which the order shall be

automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been

dismissed for non-prosecution.

In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is

no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage.

The petitioners who are working as Punjabi Masters/

Mistresses in the Education Department, Government of Punj