SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UT OF CHANDIGARH – Respondent


CRR No.4649 of 2016 (O&M)

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CRR No.4649 of 2016 (O&M)

Decided on: 17.02.2018

Anil Kumar

....Petitioner

Versus

State of U.T., Chandigarh

....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Present :

Mr. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate

for Mr. Gagandeep S. Wasu, APP, U.T., Chandigarh.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J.

Challenge in this revision petition is to the judgment of

conviction and order of sentence dated 24.12.2015 passed by the

Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh vide which the petitioner

along with co-accused Sandeep were held guilty of offences punishable

under Section 419 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') i.e. cheating

by impersonation and acquitted both of them under Section 420 IPC

and both were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period

of 01 year as well as the judgment dated 02.12.2016 passed by the

Lower Appellate Court vide which the co-accused – Sandeep was

acquitted of the charges and the appellant was though acquitted of

charge under Section 420 IPC, however, his sentence under Section 419

IPC was u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top