HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ARUN SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS – Respondent
CRWP No. 971 of 2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No. 971 of 2016
DATE OF DECISION :- July 22, 2016
Arun Sharma
...Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SNEH PRASHAR
Present:-
Mr. Kanhiya Soni, Advocate for the petitioner.
***
1.
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
judgment?
Yes/No
2.
To be referred to the Reporters or not?
Yes/No
3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? Yes/No
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
1.
On asking of the Court Mr. V.K. Kaushal, Advocate took
notice for Union of India.
2.
Heard the submissions made on either side.
3.
The petitioner is a practicing advocate, who has invoked extra
ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 read with 227 of the
Constitution of India, in respect of a PMLA Complaint No.4 of 2015 filed
by an authority under PMLA before the Special Court for PMLA at
Mumbai in ECIR no. ECIR/14/MZO/2013 inter alia against M/s Namdhari
Food International Pvt. Ltd., Shri Inder Singh Bal, Shri Iqbal Singh Bal,
PARVINDER SINGH
2016.08.01 14:07
I attest to the accuracy and
integrit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.