SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ARUN SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS – Respondent


CRWP No. 971 of 2016

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP No. 971 of 2016

DATE OF DECISION :- July 22, 2016

Arun Sharma

...Appellant

Versus

Union of India and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SNEH PRASHAR

Present:-

Mr. Kanhiya Soni, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment?

Yes/No

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? Yes/No

M.JEYAPAUL, J.

1.

On asking of the Court Mr. V.K. Kaushal, Advocate took

notice for Union of India.

2.

Heard the submissions made on either side.

3.

The petitioner is a practicing advocate, who has invoked extra

ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 read with 227 of the

Constitution of India, in respect of a PMLA Complaint No.4 of 2015 filed

by an authority under PMLA before the Special Court for PMLA at

Mumbai in ECIR no. ECIR/14/MZO/2013 inter alia against M/s Namdhari

Food International Pvt. Ltd., Shri Inder Singh Bal, Shri Iqbal Singh Bal,

PARVINDER SINGH

2016.08.01 14:07

I attest to the accuracy and

integrit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top