66

1SA No

of

2008

1

IN

11I9E I4IGH

COURT

Ol

lJNJA13

8IIARYANA

AI

CHANIOIGARI

ISA

No

of

2008

10ccidcd 0n1112010

1

0

Rllkllluddi ⁿ

Appcll2llll

C

I

C5

Versus

I

Fazru

Respondc

Z

m

CORAMONBLE

MR

JUSTICK

KC

PUlll

I

a5

Present

Mravan

Malik Advocatc for lhc apIocllants

NSudhir

Advocalc 171rrcspoildCill

7

Z

1CPlJRlJ

tl

Thi ^s i^s execulion sccond appcalaeaIllSt the Judgmcntdated

14022008

passcdby ^{lcamcd Additional iistrict}

JudgeGurgacIll

vide

which thc appcalprcferredby tllc prcscntobjcctorlappel

lanl

agaiilst^llle

judglnenl^dated 18121007

passcdby ^Additional Civil

Judge ^Senior

Jhirka ^was dismisscd

hc

casc

0f Ihe

pIel701

111thc applicatioll

IS

thatlIlc Slllt for prclption

of ^saic bycosharcr 4Dll

t0 thc exlcnl of his

share theIlonblc AlocxCourt has abolishedt11clc151stIcli ofa c9sllaiel

ill lhe PutljabPrcnption

Acl

Io prccmp lhe ^so ic

hcre11wc^ilc

dccrec

1

1

1

aep

Singh Gagan

Preet

2012.11.09 16:34

True Scanned

Copy Of Original

PHHC,Chandigarh

Sahil Soni

2016.03.21 12:30

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

67

ESA No

of

2008

2

held bythedecree4lolderis ^a nullityIt has beenallegedthatthejudgment

debtors ^are still in

of ^{the suit} property ^{Therefore even} if ^the

sale deed is

the