SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUKHPAL SINGH KHAIRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH.

1.

Criminal Revision No. 4070 of 2017 (O&M)

Date of decision : November 17, 2017

Sukhpal Singh Khaira

....... Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab

..... Respondent

2.

Criminal Revision No. 4113 of 2017 (O&M)

Joga Singh & another

....... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab

..... Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.B. CHAUDHARI

PRESENT: Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate, with

Sarvshri Gautam Dutt and Abhinav Sood, Advocates,

for the petitioner in CRR-4070-2017.

Mr. G.S. Punia, Sr. Advocate, with

Mr. P.S. Punia, Advocate, for the petitioners in CRR-

4113-2017.

Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Senior Deputy Advocate General,

Punjab.

...

1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to

see the judgment? YES

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?

YES

4. Whether speaking/Reportable ? Yes.

Per A.B. Chaudhari, J.

By these two revision petitions, the three petitioners; namely

GURSHARAN SINGH KANG

2017.11.17 12:09

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this document

Criminal Revision No. 4070

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top