HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ADITYA BHATARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Civil Writ Petition No.14698 of 2013 (O&M)
DATE OF DECI SI ON: 12.07.2013
Aditya Bhatara
…..Petitioner
versus
The State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTI CE AUGUSTI NE GEORGE MASI H, JUDGE
Present:
Mr.Joginder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner
..
SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE: (Oral)
The petition has been filed, styled as PIL, for upgradation of
the Civil Hospital, Nakodar from a 50 bed hospital to a 100 bed hospital.
Even though there can be no doubt about the responsibility of the State
to provide adequate health facilities, as to how the budget allocation has
to be made for different activities under the Ministry of Health of the
State, is the m atter which the State is to address. Whether the hospital in
question has to be upgraded or there is some other more urgent need of
setting up another hospital is a matter of allocation of funds.
Not only the aforesaid, we have a democratic system right
from Panchayti system to municipal authorities to the MLA and the
Mem bers of Parl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.